Christopher Fowler Undissed

As it should be:

And as it was:

Previously here:

Christopher Fowler Dissed Again!
Christopher Fowler Gets His Byline
So Who Wrote This Then?

J.K. Rowling Wins Lawsuit Against Fan

J.K. Rowling wins copyright claim over Harry Potter website operator

“While the lexicon, in its current state, is not a fair use of the Harry Potter works, reference works that share the lexicon’s purpose of aiding readers of literature generally should be encouraged rather than stifled,” he [U.S. District Judge Robert P. Patterson] said.

He added that he ruled in Rowling’s favor because the “Lexicon appropriates too much of Rowling’s creative work for its purposes as a reference guide.”

What I don’t understand: If she didn’t sue the website, why sue when it was going to be simply printed on paper?

It seems to me she now has the right to ask for the website to be abolished too.

Well, it went before a judge and the ruling is in.

Next!

Supplemental:

Warner Bros & J.K. Rowling Win Legal Round Against “Harry Potter Rip-Off”

Previously here:

Orson Scott Card Rips J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling Trial Ends
Thanks To … Someone
J.K. Rowling Is In NYC For Her Silly Lawsuit
More About That J.K. Rowling Lawsuit
J.K. Rowling Is Wrong
Quote: J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling: A Year In The Life

Blog Notes: Go Bother The Other Two

HowManyOfMe.com

There are 3 people with my name in the U.S.A. How many have your name?

Now up to eighty-one Comments festering away (some few are probably pingbacks).

Am I ready to wade into them yet?

No.