Oil: The Other Blood #2

Endless Oil?

Everybody knows that oil and gas drilled out of the earth comes from the remains of plants and animals trapped underground millions of years ago. This received wisdom so dominates our thinking that it is enshrined in the very language we use–fossil fuels. They took eons to form, and we are using them up far faster than they can be replenished.

What if the whole theory is wrong?

That’s the premise of a small but passionate band of Russian and Ukrainian contrarians. They argue that oil and gas don’t come from fossils; they’re synthesized deep within the earth’s mantle by heat, pressure and other purely chemical means, before gradually rising to the surface. Under the so-called abiotic theory of oil, finding all the energy we need is just a matter of looking beyond the traditional basins where fossils might have accumulated.

The idea that oil comes from fossils “is a myth. … We need to change this myth,” says petroleum engineer Vladimir Kutcherov, at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden. “All kinds of rocks could have oil and gas deposits.”

Alexander Kitchka of the Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences brashly estimates that 60% of the content of all oil is abiotic in origin, and not from fossil fuels. He says companies should drill deeper to find it.

This article appears in Forbes.

This is a hypothesis already embraced by the conspiracy theorists.

I mentioned this once before, way back in February: Oil: The Other Blood

What if it turned out to be true?

There’d be no reason to be fuel-efficient. Air pollution would be prevalent globally. The greenhouse effect would amp up.

Always a catch.

Explore posts in the same categories: Reference - Science, Science

One Comment on “Oil: The Other Blood #2”

  1. gfish Says:

    There are two more catches here.

    The idea of abiotic oil is just that, an idea. Until it can be conclusively proven in experiments which simulate the conditions under which oil and other fossil fuels are supposed to develop without fossils, it’s just a whole lot of talking, numbers and abstraction.

    Secondly, if this idea is correct and we would have to drill miles and miles under the surface to get it, the effort of extracting it might be so high, it would be much cheaper to just switch to alternative energy sources. After a popped oil bubble, the barrel is hovering around $60 and that’s way too little return to drill an oil well seven miles deep.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: